Telemaster Electro Build
#1
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:00 PM
Here is the link to the ETM kit: http://www.hobby-lob...telemaster6.htm
I finished putting it together last weekend. I have not test flown it. If all the stars line up this weekend, I will get a chance to do that. To minimize my losses if all goes wrong, I don't have any video gear installed. Once it is trimmed out I will do that.
Below are some photos to the things that may be of interest. Not that there is anything new to tell, but I'll share the details anyway.
#2
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:03 PM
#3
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:09 PM
Contrary to my expectations, the Dewalt prices are slowly increasing. I think it is because more modeler's are moving over to them and are using eBay to get them. Hence, more bidding competition. In a nutshell, the $85 deals seem to be gone. The DC9360 now seems to be $110 and more. Since there are 10 cells in the Dewalt pack, I was able to build two packs for the Telemaster.
I put this pack together in a hurry. I balanced the cells before I wrapped it up. But long term, I need to pull it apart and install a balancing connector. The nice thing about A123's is that they are very safe and will not burst into flames if mistreated.
#4
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:19 PM
BTW, I hacked the Berg Rx and brought out its RSSI (relative signal strength indicator) signal on a cable. It is the blue wire seen in the photo below. I took several close-up photos, but I must have accidentally erased the flash card (can't find the photos!). So, no pretty pictures to show.
It was a delicate modification. I used Gore micro coax Teflon cable. Nice stuff, but more difficult to install. The Berg has a 31136 FM Demod IC in it; RSSI is on Pin 12. Close range RF signals are about 1.55V, long range RF is about 0.75V, and missing RF is <0.35V. The RSSI voltage will vary in each installation, so YMMV. I plan to feed the signal to the Inspire telemetry board, which displays a signal strength graphic.
EDIT: I found the lost Berg RSSI Hack photos. They were safely on the hard drive after all. See Below.
Edited by Mr.RC-Cam, 20 January 2008 - 01:28 PM.
Found Berg RSSI Photos.
#5
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:24 PM
I had planned to skip the rubber band mounted wing and instead, modify the wing mount for a bolt on installation. However, after cutting out some of the modification parts, I decided to go back to the rubber band method (to save build time). However, I replaced the wing mounting wood dowels with carbon rods. You can see them as black rods in the previous photo.
I was concerned with weight, so I decided to skip standard servos and go with strong mini's. There are four Hitec HS-225HB's for aileron and flaps. The mounting cutouts on the wing are too big, so I had to make little fiberglass adapters (scrap 0.047" PCB material).
#6
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:33 PM
The rudder also operates the tail wheel; To prevent stripping gears on that servo, I added a "servo saver" to it (Kimbrough #131).
#7
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:37 PM
The Pandora camera Pan and Tilt system mounts below the model, behind the firewall. I'm using a cased KX-131 CCD video camera on it. There is an ongoing thread that discusses the Pandora: http://www.rc-cam.co...?showtopic=1562
#8
Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:48 PM
After the test flights, I will start installing the video gear. In the end, I plan on mounting the Inspire OSD telemetry system, Garmin GPS, FMA Co-pilot, RCAP controller, and so on.
One last photo for now:
#9
Posted 31 March 2007 - 12:32 AM
Looks good so far !
Terry
#10
Posted 31 March 2007 - 12:48 AM
I´ve also been looking at those hextronic cheap brushless for my next electric, they are like 3 times cheaper than an axi, have you tried those before?
FPVspain.com
#11
Posted 31 March 2007 - 06:25 AM
There was ice on a nearby lake and nice weather, so I gave it a try. I never thought the electric motor should be powerful enough to pull the plane with camera gear and everything, but I was able to climb at ca 40º angle (vow was I surprised). The plane has 2.5º dihedral. I haven’t flown with dihedral for 20 years, so I had to “learn to fly again”. It’s almost scaring when the plane doesn’t behave as a neutral pattern plane.
As you might notice the camera gear is quite big (and powerful), but picture quality is outstanding.
The plane is only a test rig for my first FPV trials with goggles. In June I plan to use it for a video project from my birthplace in Lofoten, Northern Norway (http://www.lofoten-s...ngelskindex.htm).
I guess you’ll be hearing more about this later
Edited by cfe7, 31 March 2007 - 06:28 AM.
Failure is always an option
#13
Posted 31 March 2007 - 09:14 PM
I used to say I would never build a balsa ARF. But thank goodness for those far east sweat shops, since I can't imagine ever getting enough free time to build the kit version. BTW, the ETM's build quality is very high (better than I could have done).It's always exciting building a new plane
I would guess it is about 4º or so.... does it have 0º diedral?
Your model seems to be similar in size to my ETM, but is a bit heavier. Are the landings a bit "hot?" Did you install flaps?This is the Jamara Telemaster 60 converted to electric power (AXI 2826/12). Wingspan is 180 cm and weight is 4 kg.
#14
Posted 31 March 2007 - 11:36 PM
The model has flaperons, but I haven't used them so far. The ice I landed on was more than 2 square kilometres, so I had a lot of space to bring the plane down at high speed.Your model seems to be similar in size to my ETM, but is a bit heavier. Are the landings a bit "hot?" Did you install flaps?
My model was originally intended for a 60 2-stroke. I guess it’s much heavier than your version.
At 4 kg landings are faster than many trainers, but I’m used to fly 90-120 size pattern planes so I find comfort in the little extra speed. It prevents stall problems on final and gives a positive rudder response with engine at low rpm.
I’m going to fly this model a lot this spring to really get to know its behaviour in the air.
Failure is always an option
#15
Posted 01 April 2007 - 03:42 PM
I just maidened my Telemaster. I'm VERY happy with it. Like you, I intend to get to know it well.I’m going to fly this model a lot this spring to really get to know its behaviour in the air.
#16
Posted 04 April 2007 - 06:47 AM
4046 grams. My initial guess was 4000 grams. Not bad to miss by only 46 grams
My PT 60 with an OS 91 Surpass weights 4017 grams, so I think the Telemaster is in the area it’s supposed to be. It flies well with takeoffs less than 15 metres (with skis). Takeoffs with wheels from grass should not be more than 20-25 metres. I’ll know more when spring comes to my hometown here in the arctic.
Failure is always an option
#17
Posted 04 April 2007 - 04:31 PM
#18
Posted 08 April 2007 - 08:22 AM
Do you have some video from that maiden flight ?
#19
Posted 08 April 2007 - 09:51 AM
Sorry I didn’t record while flying that day. I was to busy learning how to fly a trainer with a lot of dihedral. I hate it when planes are not neutral in all axes
If you like to see other videos I made you can look here:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=YX06A7KH
http://www.bodomfk.n...124&module=news
By the way where are you located?
Failure is always an option
#20
Posted 08 April 2007 - 11:33 AM
I'm looking forward to do some fpv flying myself this spring,
hopefully in a month or so. Just waiting for the last bits and
pisces to arrive in the mail
Edited by FlyingHigh, 21 June 2008 - 07:45 AM.



