Jump to content


Photo

Patch Antenna Coax Loss ?


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 JetPilot

JetPilot

    RC-Cam Regular

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Interests:Long Range FPV

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:42 PM

I am using a 14 dBI patch for my 2.4 GHZ receiver. The patch from BWAV, similar to the one seen here has a couple feet of coax and an SMA connector built onto it. Is there much loss with this white coax ? I am not sure what kind it is, but probably not the best...

I was reading the coax leingth versus loss chart on cyberflyers home page, and you would think that a commercial antenna could take that into account, but it seems unlikely to me that the peak would occour at a couple feet of coax that this antenna has. It sounds like more of a marketing choice than one tested for best performance.

I wonder if it is worth ripping into this antenna to take the coax out, and mount the receiver directly to the back of it ? I guess I would still need a couple inches of coax at least. Any thoughts on this ?

JetPilot

Attached Thumbnails

  • Antenna2.4Patch.jpg

Edited by JetPilot, 06 June 2007 - 12:46 PM.

Long Range FPV

#2 Kilrah

Kilrah

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,079 posts
  • Location:Switzerland
  • Interests:Modelling, electronics, computers

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:46 PM

I've always assumed that if the guys are specialized in making antennas they should make them correctly, and never have really questioned it. I agree I haven't taken a very critical position here ;)

#3 Terry

Terry

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,090 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bridgwater,UK
  • Interests:Aerial Photography

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:51 PM

I would be very tempted to shorten the coax to the minimum and fit a good quality connector.
Looking at the quoted figures for most aerials for this band I think they must quote for the aerial with no co-ax.

Terry

#4 wallaguest1

wallaguest1

    RC-Cam'er

  • Members+
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts

Posted 06 June 2007 - 06:45 PM

as i said in rcgroups: yes

you should in my opinion cut the wire as much as you want.

wire is too thin, and you are losting dbi's

i don't know what kind of wire are they using with antenas but seems early an RG58, that got about 1 dbi of lost each meter, or maybe another with more lost, i don't know;
i just know that wire is very thin, and working at so high frecuency's, is better to keep wire as short as possible. and if it should be long, then FAT wire means better.

for them, adding a long wire of bad quality means they keep money, and they sell a 14 dbi but in facti it's just as "bad" as a 11 dbi...

standar sma connectors got a little lost too, from 0.1 to 0.5 dbi

i bet that the 8 dbi antena got a real efectivity around ~6 dbi

and same with the 14 dbi antenna

Edited by wallaguest1, 06 June 2007 - 06:57 PM.


#5 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 10 June 2007 - 12:30 PM

you will loose 1db pr meter,
so it is really bad with cables at 2.4GHz
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#6 vincent

vincent

    RC-Cam Visitor

  • Members+
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 22 July 2007 - 10:01 AM

@ 860mhz a standard F connector clips almost 1db its also about 1db per meter at 860 on RG6 cable.

The only time I get a bad picture is when i fly outside of the antenna's specs or really low to the ground.
I dont see Horizontal lines to much but when I hate them.
I am going to pick up a couple of these units and try them out.
http://rf-links.com/ampr.htm
they also make inline amps for the tx side
These guys also make some really nice micro TX's check out the MX 4,5,and 6000's
I got a price when they were new and mx 4000 was around $500 to $600 canadian.

#7 oxxyfx

oxxyfx

    RC-Cam Regular

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 24 July 2007 - 06:18 AM

There is a cable loss calculator - actually there are several, one of these is here:

http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm

This could help finding the proper cable and loss per lenght.

#8 Lupy

Lupy

    RC-Cam'er

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPip
  • 83 posts

Posted 10 August 2007 - 03:07 PM

the specs I have seen claim that the loss at 2.4ghz is greater for the connector than for a lot of cables, esp for a couple of feet of resonable cable. Unless you are going to solder a sma plug directly to the back of the antenna, I would think the risk of messing up the cable, would be greater than the gain, esp if the insulation isn't teflon. It can melt and change the spacing.

YMMV
Ken

#9 Kilrah

Kilrah

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,079 posts
  • Location:Switzerland
  • Interests:Modelling, electronics, computers

Posted 15 August 2007 - 11:52 PM

I am going to pick up a couple of these units and try them out. 
http://rf-links.com/ampr.htm

I just received one. According to Daniel the noise figure is crappy, so we'll see how it works out. Might not be worth the $150.

If it stopped raining...

Edited by Kilrah, 15 August 2007 - 11:53 PM.


#10 Daniel Wee

Daniel Wee

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 380 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 16 August 2007 - 12:06 AM

I had my patch cable cut down to just over a foot or so, or half the original length. The cable they use is high-frequency RG-58 variant I think. In any case, you should as a rule keep them as short as is needd.

Kilrah, the LNA works GREAT! Fantanstic performance I'm getting from it, no noise in my videos at all.

Daniel

#11 Kilrah

Kilrah

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,079 posts
  • Location:Switzerland
  • Interests:Modelling, electronics, computers

Posted 16 August 2007 - 12:22 AM

Kilrah, the LNA works GREAT! Fantanstic performance I'm getting from it, no noise in my videos at all.

Cool :D

Note to others: it's not the rf-links one referred to just above, that one still needs testing.

#12 Wavess

Wavess

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 343 posts
  • Location:Madrid, Spain

Posted 16 August 2007 - 05:08 AM

Kilrah, the LNA works GREAT! Fantanstic performance I'm getting from it, no noise in my videos at all.

Cool :D

Note to others: it's not the rf-links one referred to just above, that one still needs testing.

So which one is it then?
FPV Spanish
FPVspain.com

#13 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 17 August 2007 - 03:34 AM

>So which one is it then?

http://www.rfbayinc....NA/LNA-2425.pdf

I got the last one :-) sorry dudes hehe
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#14 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 17 August 2007 - 03:38 AM

http://www.rfbayinc.com/LNA.html

see here is more of them LNA2425, only 130$
looks at those specs ! neat !
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#15 Kilrah

Kilrah

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,079 posts
  • Location:Switzerland
  • Interests:Modelling, electronics, computers

Posted 17 August 2007 - 09:23 AM

I got the last one :-) sorry dudes hehe

I came early enough :P

Will be interesting to compare the 2 now :)

#16 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 17 August 2007 - 11:56 AM

for your convience :
http://www.webx.dk/r...reless/LNA2425/
now pictures of the inside stuff,
the 3 pin device SOT-89 with number 2GW is from Avago type ATF52189
it is narrow band matched to improve the NF beyond spec 1.6dB

yes it does improve range at super weak levels you can now fly longer away
with less TX power,
how much is up to your RX type, but I see improvement on all I have.

Edited by ThomasScherrer, 17 August 2007 - 12:51 PM.

Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#17 Wavess

Wavess

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Trusted Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 343 posts
  • Location:Madrid, Spain

Posted 18 August 2007 - 01:18 AM

>So which one is it then?

http://www.rfbayinc....NA/LNA-2425.pdf

I got the last one :-) sorry dudes hehe

Me too I came early enough. I previously has bought the LNA 2400 through ebay, but after reaching an agreedment with the seller I saw the LNA 2425 that looks quite better. Seller has accepted a change to 2425 paying him the difference :rolleyes:
Now a question would the LNA work fine with 2 receivers close each other in a diversity setting? Wouldn´t be worse for the receiver that doesn´t have LNA installed?

Edited by Wavess, 18 August 2007 - 01:20 AM.

FPV Spanish
FPVspain.com

#18 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 18 August 2007 - 07:59 AM

more info is now online about this:
http://www.webx.dk/r...Lna2425/lna.htm

tomorrow we will make real flight testing and compare several reveivers and LNA
and antennas and such.
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#19 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 19 August 2007 - 10:15 AM

ok we was out flying today, nice nice,
the LNA really did also show improment on real flights,
how much is really hard to tell, I have to make more accurate experiments,
tomorrow I will bring this LNA to my work and measure its performance,
lets see then, real facts values to be revealed !
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk

#20 ThomasScherrer

ThomasScherrer

    RC-Cam Mentor

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark
  • Interests:Electronics-Radioamateur-Modelplanes-Video-Homebrew electronic projects.

Posted 20 August 2007 - 04:59 AM

real facts added to the page !
Thomas Scherrer OZ2CPU www.webx.dk