Definitely not at low levels. Higher you go the better. The "bumps" in the field are like air flow, the further from the obstacle, the less "bump" gradient. Imagine a small hovercraft flying over "Sleepng policeman" speed bumps at various heights, you can imagine the effect.
Electrostatic stabilization system for UAV
Started by
elossam
, Apr 30 2005 09:11 AM
42 replies to this topic
#41
macboffin
-
- Members+
-
- 19 posts
RC-Cam Visitor
- Location:London England
- Interests:Primarily UAVs, but also anything that flies, including birds, insects.
Posted 11 January 2007 - 05:10 PM
#42
andwho
-
- Members+
-
- 1 posts
RC-Cam Visitor
Posted 08 July 2010 - 02:43 AM
I have a copy of Maynard Hill's FM article from 1973 somewhere at home.
Available on the net: http://aerospaceindu...ying Models.pdf
I also found the original AA article from Nov 1972 on the net: http://aerospaceindu...c_Autopilot.pdf
Basically the same contents.
/A
Edit: Added link to FM article.
Available on the net: http://aerospaceindu...ying Models.pdf
I also found the original AA article from Nov 1972 on the net: http://aerospaceindu...c_Autopilot.pdf
Basically the same contents.
/A
Edit: Added link to FM article.
Edited by andwho, 08 July 2010 - 03:07 AM.
#43
elossam
-
- Trusted Member
-
- 80 posts
RC-Cam'er
- Location:SP
Posted 13 July 2010 - 06:24 AM
many thanks mate, very interesting info.I have a copy of Maynard Hill's FM article from 1973 somewhere at home.
Available on the net: http://aerospaceindu...ying Models.pdf
I also found the original AA article from Nov 1972 on the net: http://aerospaceindu...c_Autopilot.pdf
Basically the same contents.
/A
Edit: Added link to FM article.
