Jump to content

modelman

Members+
  • Content Count

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About modelman

  • Rank
    RC-Cam Visitor

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.we-aeromodellers.8m.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    London -UK
  • Interests
    RC Aeromodelling, Electronics and computers.
  1. Just a quick question...Why 5 miles? To obtain such a distance you will need a transmitter that puts out Watts rather than MW's. The TX will be fairly large and a very good quality battery will also be needed to power it. This makes this setup only practical for larger models (80" upwards) because of the weight and size.
  2. Hi Robe_uk The aerial on my TX was not as good as yours. It was just a piece of wire. I simply calculated the correct length for the TX frequency which was 1.106ghz. Tested on a field strength meter and power meter. My TX has a pot on it for video signal adjustment. The signal from the camera was overloading the input and making the picture contrast too strong. I simply reduced it for the best picture quality. For best performance in range build the GP Patch you won’t regret it. As Randall rightly said a frequency counter is useful as there are many channels allocated in the 1.1/1.2ghz band
  3. Hi I bought a similar 800mw setup. The true power output is around 200mw. I rematched the Tx aerial and tweaked the video input and the quality is now superb.(as good as any 2.4ghz setup in this price range) It also has sound as well. I know the RX tuning can be an issue, however run the TX on a 1000ma AR or AAA 9.6volt pack and you wont have any more problems. It also puts out a bit more power. The 9volt transistor radio batteries are a no no as you will be constantly re-tuning. I have also found that 1.2ghz setups have slightly better range especially in more built up area's.
  4. Thanks guys for your comments. I have already done a little research. Below is the link for a USB2 device that claims real time viewing on a pc at DVD quality resolutions. It sells for around £40. Maybe someone has already tried it!! http://www.trust.com/products/product.htm?...nr=13991&show=1 And another by Maplin costing around £60 http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?Module...ldID=&doy=11m10 Regards...Mark
  5. After using a 7” DVD player screen for viewing my wireless cams images I suddenly thought why not use my 14" laptop for viewing and recording. This has presented a few issues in linking the RX's video to the computer. I wish to display my video wireless camera’s images on the laptops screen during flying in real time (30 fps). I also want to record images at this frame rate on to the laptops hard drive in my chosen format. My 1.2 GHz laptop only has USB 1.1 so I will have to fit either a USB2 or firewire card using the expansion slots. My questions are: 1) Which card is the best to use
  6. Hi Engineman, Try to run the RX from your model boxes 12 volt supply. Use a good quality 8.4 volt rechargeable battery on the TX. This should give you around 2 hour’s continuous running on a Hong Kong 200mw cam setup. You may still not get the desired results in terms of range so I strongly recommend constructing a patch antenna. As Terry rightly confirmed try to keep all dimensions as accurate as possible and you should obtain a 3 to 5x increase in range. A quick question were did you get your Laptop VIDEO to USB converter from and roughly how much did it cost? Ragards...Mark
  7. UPDATE TO MY 1.2ghz PATCH ANTENNA TEST Myself and 10 other modelers finally got round to doing some detailed in air testing with my rescaled 1.2ghz patch. The results were almost unbelievable compared to the original supplied whip antenna. 1) Range was increased from 200ft to as far up as we could see the 60" model to control it. (800/1000ft) 2) Coverage was around 180 degrees arc with 90% unbroken images throughout. 3) Antenna even worked when flying behind it. Very strange but not such strong signals. 4) With 45 degree elevation and flying in front of antenna no repositionin
  8. Most of the so called 1.2GHZ systems are actually on 1.1GHZ so a frequency counter test is a must!!!
  9. Sounds like this cheap setup could be a winner with the ccd cam. I bought a similar setup from Hong Kong as did Mr rc cam however the TX is the real let down at only 42mw output. I noticed in your picture that the TX is stand alone. Mine is built in the cam which I realise now to be a disadvantage. Is your setup 1.2 or 2.4ghz ? Have emailed you for links. Regards...Mark
  10. I'm glad our test results matched. We must be doing something right!! I will have to get round to trying the cone and see what extra gain can be grabbed. Some other sites suggested that a correctly assembled patch had a 65 degree horizontal and 75 degree virtical angle, forming in fact an oval shaped radiation pattern. I'm not quite sure why this is but maybe something like ground effect makes the angles different. I'm no patch expert yet but I'm learning. Regards...Mark
  11. There is no need to answer the questions I asked on patch antenna gain thanks. If anyone is interested on how a patch works and produces 8db of gain then all is reviled here. http://www.orbanmicrowave.com/antenna_appl...ation_notes.htm Regards...Mark
  12. Hi everyone, In answer to your question Terry I conducted some tests today. By adding a ¼ wave reflector to the original whip I found a medium increase in performance. The results were about ½ the range of the patch design. Using the half wave dipole as ref to 0db I would expect a 3db increase in signal strength using a rear reflector. This should equate to around 1 ½ to 2x range which is roughly what I found during testing. I don’t know if this matches your results but I consider my findings to be only approximate. This brings me on to my question of how does a patch antenna receive u
  13. Hi everyone, some interesting comments on the so called all British made cam. I have now constructed a Patch antenna for my Hong Kong Cam setup. First a point for people intending to purchase one of these setups. The seller assured me 100% the cam was 1.2 GHz but that was rubbish. A freq counter proved that 1.106 was the exact frequency. So most of these cams on EBay should be sold as 1.1 GHz models. For those of you that have a 1.1 GHz setup here's the re-scaled patch dimensions. LARGE PLATE = 232mm SMALL PLATE = 123mm SPACERS = 10.85mm 11mm should be ok Try to keep t
  14. Thanks everyone for your comments and info. Has anyone tried using the below setup from this company? http://www.rc-cam.co.uk/Products.htm Anyway about to construct a re-scaled patch antenna for my 1.106ghz Hong Kong Phoey setup. Will publish my results here in the near future. The weather in the UK is not looking too good for the next 4 days so in flight testing might be put on hold for a while. Regards...Mark
  15. Thanks for the info Terry, I must admit I never intended to use this equipment as my main system. It was more of a experimental project and at £20 it doesn't matter if I damage it through modding. I have currently only seen one uk company selling a complete setup at about £165. I would be grateful of any info or prices of other current 2.4ghz equipement available. If company names and price's cannot be displayed here please mail to :-clubmail-AT-tiscali.co.uk which is our club address.(west Essex Aeromodellers) Myself and others would be interested to know which 2.4ghz equipment and aer
×
×
  • Create New...