Jump to content

Attention: RC-CAM.com will be closing down August 2021.

The RC-Cam.com forum was the very first online community dedicated to the advancement of wireless video cameras on radio controlled (R/C) models. This is now called "FPV" (First Person View). We are proud of the contributions that our members have made to the FPV hobby.

We've seen significant changes over the last twenty years. Initially there were a lot of eager R/C hobbyist that built their own video systems. Allowing these creative individuals to share their work was the purpose of this site. Now the FPV market is flooded with low cost systems; Sadly DiY FPV video projects are now rarely discussed.

RC-CAM.com (main site and forum) will be closing down August 2021. This was announced several months ago (March 2021) to allow our members ample time to download any information that is important to them. After the site is shutdown the information will no longer be available here.

We appreciate every member's involvement with advancing the FPV hobby. It is indeed sad to say goodbye to all our online friends. Be safe and stay healthy.

double sided patch?

Recommended Posts

The main issues are that it will not be a propper match to the co-ax or RX and the results will be unpridictable. Oh and I forgot ther increased chance of multipath interference.


Edited by Terry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory yes, ut in practice it seems to work "abnormally" well... For now I haven't been able to bring a technical argument he couldn't counteract by a "yes but it works"...

To me his thing if it works should behave more like an omni in the end, but in practice it works loads better than the 3 omnis he compared to... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused by what he started with and what he ended up with. It's hard to tell the full story from the photos.

When I look at the photos at his web site and the forum discussion, I see that the stock antenna appears to have a PCB based half-wave dipole on one side, with a simple ground plane on the other. So, at first glance from the photos, I just don't recognize a common PCB based patch antenna at all. At this point it seems to be a simple monopole with ground plane / reflector.

But then I see that there is another PCB that has a more traditional looking patch element on it (or so I think), but no coax connections to it. Ok, so the design seems to rely on the RF coupling from the half-wave element to the floating patch element.

But from what I can see in the pre-mod photo, the second board with the patch-like element appears to be on the wrong side of the half-wave element (it's behind the ground plane). I think it might be an illusion from the posted photos. Or maybe the stock antenna was taken apart and then put back together in the wrong order for the photo shoot? Honestly, it is really hard to know for sure.

The final construction is a bit of a mystery to me. The center board is the one with the coax feedline that drives the half-wave stripline element and the groundplane. But then this board is sandwiched between the two patch-like elements and separated by the air dielectric. One of the boards is in a place that would allow RF coupling to the half-wave driven element. But the other one is on the back side of the groundplane/reflector. There would be some RF coupling, but I can't imagine the signal strength would be very high on that side.

I'm not surprised that the triple deck two headed antenna receives on both sides since I have flown on the backside of some patch antennas and obtained video signals too when the Tx was within a reasonable distance. Overall, I am not sure what advantage a non-optimized two headed patch would have over a well designed dipole whip antenna.

Some measurements would really be grand (to see the technical performance). I would definitely give the project 4-stars for ingenuity, especially since the builder is happy with the results. That is all that matters. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There's more photo and video of my antenna here:


There no electrical connection between the front, the rear and the central plate.

The difference between with or without the rear plate is very high.

The normal patch antenna as just the plate with cable and connector and the front plate.

I only have ad a plate (like the front plate) symetrical opposed on the rear side.

Exuse me for my bad english... :P

Edited by Muppet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A photo on the site that I didn't notice before shows an aperature slot in the reflector (behind the driven element). It is a very unique antenna and quite unusual when compared to a typical PCB patch design. It's even more unusual after your modifications. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...