Jump to content

Attention: RC-CAM.com will be closing down August 2021.

The RC-Cam.com forum was the very first online community dedicated to the advancement of wireless video cameras on radio controlled (R/C) models. This is now called "FPV" (First Person View). We are proud of the contributions that our members have made to the FPV hobby.

We've seen significant changes over the last twenty years. Initially there were a lot of eager R/C hobbyist that built their own video systems. Allowing these creative individuals to share their work was the purpose of this site. Now the FPV market is flooded with low cost systems; Sadly DiY FPV video projects are now rarely discussed.

RC-CAM.com (main site and forum) will be closing down August 2021. This is being announced now (March 2021) so that everyone has time to download any information that is important to them. After the site is shutdown the information will no longer be available here.

We appreciate every member's involvement with advancing the FPV hobby. It is indeed sad to say goodbye to all our online friends. Be safe and stay healthy.

11dbi circularly-polarized antenna beam width: 70°

Recommended Posts

Hello, just wanted to share this with you guys. :D

I came across a nice simple patch antenna which is easy to make and has a wide beam angle of 70°

11 dbi Circulary Polarized Antenna

Some Specs:

Frequency : 2.400 - 2.500 GHz

Gain : 11 dBiVSWR : < 1.22


BEAM WIDTH • Horizontal: 70° • Vertical: 70°


DIMENSIONS • 25 x 102 x 102 mm

To get a wider beam width just set them in a array configuration.

Array antenna

Will let you now when I tested this patch antenna !

** Attached is the circle in fullsize.


Edited by CaptKiwi
Link to post
Share on other sites
If indeed it is circular polarization, there will be a lot of db loss with a horizontal or vertical polarized antenna on the aircraft.

Not much, 3dB if I remember well. And in return, you avoid the -25dB or so you would get with a linearly polarised antanna when it's cross-polarised (oriented perpendicularly to the TX antenna).

In theory, it's more down to a (simplified) choice of "good all the time" vs "excellent in some conditions but awful in others".

But the most important is practice, and when testing linear 8dB vs circular 8dB I was having better quality with the linear one throughout an standard flight. So I stayed with linear ones. Might me more tricky if you don't know how to arrange your antennas though, the circular could be giving better results in that case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't trust it. Haven't looked at db tables for a long time but IIRC a 3db loss equates to a 50% loss in signal strength which would affect the range. Probably immaterial at the distances we fly at though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3dB indeed equates to 50% less signal power, which in turns means a 0.7x factor in range. It'snot a big price to pay to avoid signal losses due to bad orientations, but as said (at least for me) it didn't cut it in practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...